|
|
|
SINTA WERNER In most of my architectonic installations there is one particular viewing point from which the space appears flat and pictorial. If one leaves this viewing point, the illusion of flatness is exposed. The interplay of exhibition space and additional architectural components now appears unstable, cubist and fragmented. In the centre of my artistic practice is the interest in the perception of space and its impact on a feeling of irritation, desorientation and vertigo. Mostly I react on the specific exhibition space by mirroring, doubling or adding architectural elements. Therefore I use methods derived from one-point perspectival construction as well as anamorphosis and camouflage. The architectonic installations developed from painting and approaches in which I wanted to extend the notion of painting. In that context I am engaged with the tradition of illusionistic painting, with one-point perspective and Alberti's model of the visual pyramid. I am interested in the in-between-state between picture and space and therefore in principles known from stage design. I use scenographic mechanisms, for example the foreshortening of space, which is similar to a stage ('Dissolve', installation 2008) or painted objects that are put up like sceneries ('Panorama', painting 2005). Another topic is the mirroring of rooms, for example in the work 'Disjunction'(2007). The entrance area of the exhibition space and the change rooms of the former Victorian swimmimg pool behind the entrance area appear like the mirrored reflection in a sqare plane of an unreal mirror. From different angles it becomes clear that only the illusion of a flat mirror is conveyed and that in reality the installation spreads into the space behind the mirror. In other works, for example in 'Changing Cubicle' (painting installation, 2007) spatiality is dissolved. I painted the changing cubicle in brighter and darker grey tones in order to equalize the luminosity and thereby eliminate the form of the room.
Disjunction Dissolve Sinta Werner is interested in projections at the interface between photography, sculpture and architecture. In the piece ‘Dissolve’ she responds to Stedefreund’s trapezoidal exhibition space with precisely formed, built-in elements, making the room’s perspectivally skewed configuration the subject of her artistic investigation. Using methods derived from one-point perspective construction, she creates duplications, overlaps and disruptions, both structurally and optically. Alberti’s model of the visual pyramid, the basis for every examination of art up to the present day, is simulated in three-dimensional space, shifting the observer’s perception and the exhibition space itself to the foreground of the analysis. (Carla Orthen) In this collaborative work, Markus Wüste and Sinta Werner let a projection of an everyday-situation appear threedimensional: A distant place appears to have been teleported into the exhibition space, as in science fiction. (Carla Orthen)
’Space Collages’ depict an impossible, illogical place - one that allows for a collapse of order. My aim is to re-examine the validity of one-point perspective and its claim of verisimilitude. As a result of this proposal of multiple viewing points, the imaginary position of the viewer is de-centered. In ’Space Collages’ the collapse of perspectival order is confronted with the collapse of modernist utopias represented in the dismembered interior of a council house.
Cleaning Closet I painted the walls of a cleaning closet in such a way that the cleaning utensils and appliances fused with their background. A mixture of camouflage and negative shadowing evokes this loss of space. The vacuum cleaner appears like a frog in mimetic disguise.
Changing Cubicle For Changing Cubicle I used a wooden changing
room in a former Victorian indoor pool as support for painting. Somewhere or Other The picture-objects ’Somewhere or Other’ are composed of large-format slides of architectural sights taken from different angles. The slides are arranged like miniature folding-screens, so that one can see different variations of superimposition while surrounding the work. The configuration of the slides creates a fracturing and dematerialization of the original image, disorienting the viewer. This fragmented assembly is much like a reconstruction based on dreams or memories of the past, evoking a vague sense of places and feelings of childhood.
Perspicere (to look through) is comprised of a pinhole camera with five holes and photographs on each wall of the pentagon shaped box. The photographs have been taken with that camera and are presented in the camera body. I took the photographs at a junction at Kensington Gardens in London, a Victorian park with strictly arranged alleys. Through each hole, the image of the alley was projected onto the two opposite sides, so that altogether five exposures came into being. With Perspicere I make reference to Jonathan Crary’s engagement with the history of photography’s origin, described in his book ’Techniques of the Observer’. Crary questions the general supposition that photography evolved directly from the camera obscura. For more than two centuries, the camera obscura symbolized a model for epistemology. It stood for a spectator who could understand and redefine the world from a separated point of view - the vantage point inside the camera obscura. The camera obscura became a symbol of how one could draw truthful conclusions about the exterior world by mere observation. Crary believes it was not the camera obscura, but other optical devices that would rather create optical illusions, that were relevant to the invention of photography. With Perspicere I confuse perspectival representation through multiplication, the arrangement of images in space and double exposures. With this work I want to draw attention to the still-dominant acceptance of Renaissance perspective. Photography is still considered to be a representation of verisimilitude. Furthermore I am interested in the relationship between spectator and image. Since Alberti, the perspectival image has been understood as a window that separates the spectator from the world. I want to point to this exclusion of the spectator by reversing the original relationship between world and spectator. This time it is not the spectator, but the object that is self-contained and gives the viewer insight through the five vantage points.
Strips of mirror are arranged in such a way
that they mirror the light of neon tubes directly towards a particular
point in the room. Standing here, the spectator will find himself in
the limelight (=Rampenlicht). Airfield The starting point of this installation was a photographs of an airport runway. The intention was to question the borders of painting as well as the convention that a picture is presented in a rectangular format and placed in a vertical plane. With Airfield I wanted to deconstruct these pictorial components. I maintained the rectangular format of the image, but tipped it over, so that it came to lie on a diagonal plane. My aim was to illustrate the process of a picture coming into being, as if the plane of the runway is stuck in the middle of the process of becoming a picture. It is in an in-between state, not yet situated on the vertical wall. Compared to a scenery set, the pictorial space is pervious. One can step into the picture. By entering the room, you inevitably find yourself behind the scenery. The inspiration for this work came from experiencing
the moment of take-off in a plane, when the ground seems to angle away. Framework Framework is at the same time picture frame, representation of one point perspective and construction in space. The content is empty or that is to say the content is the framework plot. The work consists of the frame and is simultaneously an indication to the meaning of the frame in art history. Greenberg's postulation of modernist art was to concentrate on the most important characteristics of the specific medium. For painting this meant that it should be occupied with its inherent features like flatness and the rectangular shape of the canvas. The painting of Frank Stella exemplifies this pure concept of painting that does not refer to anything outside painting but is only self-reflexive. Donald Judd transferred the already object-like painting into space in order to avoid more consequently any form of referentiality and illusionism. Framework is meant as a reference to this tradition of self-referentiality in art and reflects in a self-critical way its own self-reflexivity.
Panorama Since 2003,
I have been engaged with making painted objects that refer to stage
design. Using the language of painting these objects question the borders
and characteristics of the medium. Though, the main topic of these works
is the illusion of space represented in a plane and the opposite - the
illusion of flatness in space. Stage scenery interests me because of
its abstract qualities. It represents a state between drawing and actual
constructed space which is capable of existing as a compressed space. Colour and its impact in space plays a significant role in my working practice. The rather obvious intention of evoking an optical illusion is disturbed by the quality of colour to create space. Beach Box The work »beach box« engages the themes one point perspective and scenery in order to think about painting. The central-perspective is confronted with a mathematical space which is defined by coordinates arranged in rectangular angles. The motive beach I have chosen because it seemed to be suitable for the illustration of central-perspective. The composition is based on the horizon and the alignment between the beach and the sea. Both lines cross at the vanishing point. If the central perspective and the coordinate system are reduced to a scheme, both schemes consist of lines that meet at one point. In the work beach box I tried to evoke an irritation by making one scheme overlap the other. The picture of a beach has been exposed onto the construction of MDF, after being covered with foto-emulsion. The vanishing point is situated at the edge of the construction. The viewer perceives the image initially as a plane and then as an illusionistic space.
The work Kulissen makes reference to the wings of a stage scenery. The horizontal lines which become more tight together to one sight, as in a perspective space, appear to be parallel from a particular standing point. The illusionistic image is always the representation of a threedimensional starting point in a twodimensional plane. In the tradition of abstract painting such as Colorfield Painting or Geometric Abstraction, it became essential to emphasize the flatness of painting. In painting, the illusion of space was to be banished. I am using a repertoire of forms which reminds of these fields of art. But it is my interest to pick out as a central theme topics just as central perspective and illusion of space. As well as creating an optical illussion, I wish to question: How does our perception function? What does this work mean in the context of art? What does it say about painting? »Kulissen« has been exhibited in two different arrangements. I am interested in the interchangeable possibilities of this kind of work. If the canvases are standing on the floor, they loose their attributes as a painting and become indeed scenery wings. In the work “Kulissen, where canvas sceneries are arranged in the room, the foreshortened lines on the canvases appear, depending on the viewer’s stand point, to be parallel.
EDUCATION 2006 iiEastwood
/ Moschee, Karl-Marx-Str. 58, Berlin?iiiiiiiii Grants 2003iii NICA-Stipendium of the Universität der Künste, Berlin
© NETTIE HORN 2008 |